Of course, as many critics have pointed out, we wouldn't have had much of a play then. What then was it about Hamlet that casused his own downfall and lead to the tragedy that so many were involved in? Hamlet, himself, in Act 1, scene 4 alludes to that fault in
One aspect of Oedipus personality that leads to his downfall is his constant search for truth. Throughout the play, Oedipus is always trying to discover something whether it be about himself or an attempt at uncovering someone else as an enemy.
Another aspect of Oedipus personality that causes his misfortune is his hubris. Although this is the plan of action that most Thebans would want, in reality, the city and Oedipus have nothing to gain from finding the murderer of Laius but a sense of justice, this highlights Oedipus unnecessary search for truth.
It was a selfish search for an invaluable piece of information to begin with, that is why his search for the truth is not beneficial.
Also, part way through his journey towards his downfall he decides to investigate his own identity. Jocasta advises against it strongly but he ignores her. Him of all people, assuming he recognizes that he has killed people in the past, has a wife old enough to be his mother and has a prophecy foretold about him that is beyond horrifying, chooses to point out his own faults by pursuing his own identity.
But he still chooses to follow through with his search. He could have lived happily even though his wife was also his mother as long as he kept himself from finding out. This is why his personal choice to expose his identity leads to his demise.
In terms of how the play could have ended, Oedipus chooses to search for himself, therefore choosing tragedy. With every choice and accusation he makes he has a passionate knowledge that he is doing the right thing, which is untrue.
That will be the easiest way for both of us to bear our burden. This is a mistake, and although there are no direct consequences of his accusation, Creon was on Oedipus side from the beginning, and did all he could to help; by introducing Tiresius to Oedipus.
Had Oedipus not offended Creon, Creon may have been there with him for the long haul, but instead Oedipus chose to offend his friend through his hubris, choosing to solve the mystery without help, leading to his tragic discovery.
It is enough that I am sick to death. Once again, Oedipus is given very explicit advice that is guaranteed to benefit him, but he wanted to figure out the puzzle, and his hubris leads him to believe he always makes the right decision.
So once again, Oedipus not only ignores the advice but he also insults his wife, which is a slap in the face when she is trying her best to save him.
Oedipus made the choice to follow through with his search and ignore Jocasta, when if he had been humble and listened, he would have been happy. That is why Oedipus hubris leads to his demise. Oedipus was haunted with a dark prophecy, but it is through his flaws that the prophecy did come true… Popular Essays.Get an answer for 'To what extent is Hamlet responsible for his own downfall and ultimately, the tragic ending of the play??' and find homework help for other Hamlet questions at eNotes.
There is no questioning that Louis XVI is, in fact, partially responsible for his own downfall, but other factors, both short term and long term, also contributed to his downfall.
Awkward and timid, Louis XVI found himself on the throne at the age of twenty, succeeding his grandfather Louis XV.
Was Charles I the architect of his own downfall Charles I became King of England, Scotland and Ireland since until where a civil war took place because of Charles . The Necessity of His Knights The Downfall of King Lear "I am a man more sinn'd against than sinning." King Lear, (III, ii, ) The L ve Test Giving Away His Power King Lear decides to give up his land to his three daughters at the opening of the play.
Charles was the architect of his own downfall because too many Protestants didn’t trust him, for example after Charles became king he married a French catholic, Henrietta-Maria de Bourbon. Wolters did not destroy the Chronicle, and, as his friendship with Speer deteriorated, allowed access to the original Chronicle to doctoral student Matthias Schmidt (who, after obtaining his doctorate, developed his thesis into a book, Albert Speer: The End of a Myth).